media
blog
New Video: The Constantly Connected Shopper
14 Feb 2011 Posted by Brian Spencer
Shoppers are spending more time than ever researching online before they shop offline. Recent data from Google shows 51% of shoppers are researching products online before they visit a store and 70% of smartphone owners use their phone in some capacity to help them shop.
Marketers need media plans which include these digital touch points. Watch this video from Google of real shoppers talking about their digital shopping tools:
... read full article
Does Rich Media Still Matter?
03 Feb 2011 Posted by Brian Spencer
Brands use rich media to add interactivity to banner advertising. This interactivity increases click rates through expandable banner panels, videos, location finders, games, and other features. For a great example, check-out our recent rich media banner for John Deere which won a Beanie Award from Pointroll.
Recently, the value of rich media has been questioned as ad exchanges have reduced the CPM’s of traditional banner ads. The theory is that brands don’t need rich media interactivity if they can beat the cost per click through ad exchanges. It suddenly looks like the cost to produce and serve rich media isn’t worth the increased click rate.
The problem is that most marketers expect their advertising to do more than deliver cheap clicks. Brands need a deeper level of engagement with the 99.9% of users who won’t click through. Rich media campaigns often see interaction rates of 5% or better (50 times higher than the click rate). Here are three ways that interactive rich media banners deliver better engagement:
1 – Interaction improves message recall and association. Good teachers don’t just lecture; they engage students with dialogue and activities because they know interaction increases message retention and comprehension. The results from an Eyeblaster/Microsoft study of 800 campaigns shows that the same is true for shoppers interacting with ads. Interactive banners were more than twice as effective as non-interactive banners at lifting recall and message association.
2 – Interaction leads to consideration. Any good sales person wants shoppers to touch the product because interaction makes it easier to imagine owning it. That is why test drives, product samples, and dressing rooms improve sales. The same is true online. Give shoppers an opportunity to interact with your product and you move them further down the path to purchase.
3 – Interaction makes your brand convenient. The top 3 rules of retailing are “Location, Location, Location,” because shoppers demand convenience. People behave the same way online. They don’t want to leave the site they were visiting and they don’t want to hunt for buried information. Rich banners allow shoppers to explore features without leaving the site they were on. It is like having a showroom in the exact neighborhood the shopper is already in.
Using ad exchanges and other tactics to achieve low-cost clicks is still an important strategy for many marketers. But brands should not walk away from the engagement delivered by rich media.
... read full article
Tv And Online Ads Work Best Together To Boost Recall
08 Jun 2010 Posted by Market and Main Media
TV or online? Online or TV? Which is best for boosting ad and message recall? A recent analysis of Nielsen IAG data by Yahoo! concludes that neither TV nor online advertising alone work as well as a combination of the two. In fact, using both media for ads doubles the effectiveness of your campaign.
Nielsen’s data show that brand recall for ads seen only on TV was 21% while ads seen on both TV and online yielded twice as much brand recall (42%). Likewise, when TV and online ads were combined, message recall jumped to 32% from a mere 14% with TV only ads. Frequency of viewing online ads only strengthened TV brand recall. Viewers who saw just one online ad before viewing the TV ad increased their brand recall by 18%. Viewers who saw an online ad 20 or more times before viewing the TV ad increased their brand recall by more than 50%.
To determine the optimal balance between TV and online spending, Yahoo! developed test cases for brands in the CPG, auto, entertainment and retail sectors using Nielsen data. Yahoo! concluded that “a 10% to 15% shift from TV to online increased reach and significantly lowered cost per point (CPP).”
This is welcome news for advertisers as it becomes more costly to advertise on TV and as consumers’ media viewing options greatly. In just eight years (from 2000 to 2008), the TV cost per thousand per household rose from $14 to $26. Meanwhile, TV viewing has remained flat for the past 5 years (2004 – 2009) and online Internet participation grew by 117%.
... read full article
